Quote:
Originally Posted by clarionite
Is that any different than posting them on this site?
|
The difference is in the resolution. My desktop is 1920 pixels on the longest side. The site limit is 600...which isn't large enough to turn into a very good print. But 1920 would be.
I'm not sure I get the value of the screen saver. Windows and OS X both will display photos the user puts in a folder in a built-in screensaver. I agree with Scott that distribution of the screensaver would be limited to sites RG already controls, so they wouldn't drive much in the way of new traffic. That would require things like link exchanges and buying search terms from popular engines. Search for "photo critique" on Google and you won't find ShotCritic in the first 5 pages.
Right now the keywords and description for the site (the meta tags) are a bit weak. As we build up some content and RG gets his features set, he'll then be able to turn his attention to
SEO ... together those things will drive more people here more than anything. Keep posting photos, comments and advice!